Friday, September 14, 2012

Interview with DeMisty Bellinger-Delfeld Conducted by Antonio Bouxa September 2012



Why do you write?
Because I like to, because I have to, like any other writer will tell you.
Is there a reason you write short fiction?
I write short fiction because I have twins.  Two very young children, they’re three years old.  That format allows me to work quickly, get things out and revise it in the time that I have.  I teach five classes and I try to give my students as much attention as possible, however much time that affords me.  Stuff I write lately is a lot of prose poems.  Or rather, it could be considered cross genre as prose poems and flash fiction and a lot of times it’s genre-less.  I do write longer short stories and am working on a novel.
Is there a specific audience for your novel?
That is a difficult question for me, and it’s a question that’s very easy when I write non-fiction…there is a very specific audience for my scholarly work although my work is not really scholarly, it’s usually along the lines of the craft, of making fiction or teaching of it through pedagogy.  But as far as my fiction goes, and my creative work, I don’t think that I have an audience in mind.  I wouldn’t say that its young adult, but I wouldn’t not say that it’s young adult.  I don’t think I do, do you have an audience in mind when you write creative work?  It’s something that’s important to think about especially when you’re starting to market your work.  When you are working with short works you just look at the different journals that are out there, online or whatever, but when you start marketing to somebody like an agent, or for a novel,  that agent my want to know in your pre-letter “who is your target audience?”
Is there something your novel is capable of handling that your short fiction isn’t?
This is the first really long work that I’ve done.  One thing that I’ve learned with this is that much more needs to be told to an audience, to a reader, than in short fiction.  Short fiction has a lot of implication, you have only so much space to work with, but with novels you can spend more time on description, with back story, with exposition and stuff like that.  That I’m not used to, and usually when you revise you do a lot of cutting away, but when I’m revising this novel I’m doing a lot of adding too, just to fill it out a little more.  It reads right now, although it’s over two hundred pages, it reads like a two hundred page plus short story in some aspects, so I’m working on that too.  When I first starting writing it, the professor that I started with when I was still in grad school, I asked him “does this sound like a series of short stories or does this sound like a novel?” and he said “this is a novel.”  And he’s a novelist so I respect what he says.
What about content?  What are you trying to achieve with this novel?  Is there a message?
I wish! That sounds really important.  The one thing that I could think of to describe the novel is, very simply, is that there are three protagonists, three women, and all three fall in love with other people.  Those relationships are very taboo, one is set in the thirties and is a homosexual relationship, one is set in the forties and is an interracial relationship, and one is set in the sixties and is a May/December relationship.  The idea is that, even if you were to be in that relationship, even if you’re in love, it’s okay if that relationship ends.  Even if it’s taboo, even if you fought for it, if that relationship ends [it’s okay].  When I explain it right now it sounds very chick-lit-ish.  It sounds really pretentious to call your own work literary but I think it’s more literary than that.  The exterior conflict is class, there are class issues, there’s racism.
Your work seems to deal with race very transparently.
The only time I include things about race is if it’s important.  What I did with “What Plums Would Do” the reason I wrote that…as an exercise that I gave myself…is how do you write about a culture outside of your own without appropriating that culture?  So I thought it would be fun to write about another culture from the perspective of someone outside of it.  I had fun writing that. 
Your writing seems to handle themes like race in very genuine ways, without making it the forefront of the piece. Is there any intent to do that or a way you go about doing that?
No, I wish I was that smart.  Some advice I gave to a fellow student at a writing workshop once, he was writing outside of his race.  He was writing about black people, and I didn’t know why I was not liking it.  To me his work sounded insincere, and he was a very good writer.  This particular piece, I didn’t like it, and I thought about it, and it was constantly thinking about being black.  You said you were Latino, how often do you actually go around thinking about being Latino?  Unless something happens that brings it to the forefront you just don’t think about it.  It’s part of your identity, it exists, but no one goes around constantly thinking “I’m a woman, I’m a woman, I’m a woman.”  So I thought of an analogy, if it leaks in your house and it rains, you think about it, but unless it’s raining, you aren’t thinking about it.
So how do you go about being sincere to someone-else’s race?
That’s a hard question, I don’t know.  I think just in real life, if you’re going to accept others as who they are, you have to first accept them as a person.  If race comes into the picture at all, deal with it as it comes, but you don’t have to deal with race.  It is the same with dialect.  Dropping verbs, certain words, you don’t want to make it look like Mark Twain.  I like Mark Twain, and that was fine in the 1800’s but it’s not fine today.  If you can say someone is from the south and talked with a Louisiana accent, you don’t even have to display the accent, just hearing it is enough for the audience.  If you do it well…I don’t know if I do it well.
You mentioned poetry earlier, is there something your poetry accomplishes that your other work cannot?
No, I wish.  I think it’s just because I can write really short poems, it’s really because of the kids.  I’m not not going to write, you’re a writer, you have to write something down, so what can do you with the time that you have.  I was told this summer by a literary consultant, a woman at Bread Loaf who makes it her business as well as being a writer, telling you about your work, where it would be placed in magazines and which journals you should submit to.  She told me that my fiction is very poetic, more poetic than prose.  So, I started off as a poet, or I thought I was a poet and then when I went to grad school I decided that I didn’t want to write poetry because everyone was doing it. 
So you went to short fiction?
I was already writing short fiction at that point but yeah.
So the novel is really where you want to focus?
Right now, yeah.  As a student you might be interested in this, it’s easier to publish a novel than publishing short fiction.  The reason why, is because people read novels, students and writers read short fiction.  This is going on the internet and that’s going to be bad for me to say but really how many people do you know that read short story collections that aren’t writers are students.  They are starting to become more popular and I don’t understand why they aren’t as popular as they are because you can read them in a single sitting and with our attention spans it seems like short stories would be more popular, even novellas.  But no, novels, people buy novels.  The first time I taught a lit class, I taught a lot of short stories and my students were really annoyed with that.  They thought it was more difficult to access short stories than novels, I guess I understand that too, because if you remember when we first started talking, short stories are implications, you have to do a lot more work to get into the story.  Readers have to be a little more imaginative.  I know that these are generalizations.  One of the things that Dr. Burns told me when I was a student here, she drew it on the board, she said she didn’t like Hemingway and I don’t really like Hemingway either, but she drew like these humps when we read “Hills Like White Elephants” it’s a short piece, mostly dialogue.  One of the characters in the story looks at these hills and says “they look like white elephants” because all you see are the top of the hills.  And Dr. Burns said like in short stories, you’re just seeing the top of the stories, the exposition you don’t see you just kind of assume, and I thought that was a good analogy.
Is there any advice you’d like to give new writers?
Read, and write.  Musicians practice their instrument hours a day, and when they learn songs they listen to variations of them over and over again.  I’m not saying to write for hours every day, but even half an hour, fifteen minutes, practice.  And read, read everything, read the back of a cereal box, learn how language works and learn how other people are using it.

1 comment: